Bibliothèque Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Mention de date : june 2007
Paru le : 27/07/2007
|
Dépouillements
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier
[article]
Titre : |
The Madness of King Jesus : Why was Jesus Put to Death, but his Followers were not? |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Justin J. Meggitt, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2007 |
Article en page(s) : |
pp. 379-413. |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Tags : |
Jesus death madness king |
Résumé : |
To argue that Jesus of Nazareth was put to death by the Roman authorities because they believed him to be a royal pretender of some kind, fails to explain satisfactorily why he was killed but his followers were not. A possible solution to this conundrum, which is supported by neglected contextual data, is that the Romans thought Jesus of Nazareth to be a deranged and deluded lunatic. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 379-413.
[article] The Madness of King Jesus : Why was Jesus Put to Death, but his Followers were not? [texte imprimé] / Justin J. Meggitt, Auteur . - 2007 . - pp. 379-413. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 379-413.
Tags : |
Jesus death madness king |
Résumé : |
To argue that Jesus of Nazareth was put to death by the Roman authorities because they believed him to be a royal pretender of some kind, fails to explain satisfactorily why he was killed but his followers were not. A possible solution to this conundrum, which is supported by neglected contextual data, is that the Romans thought Jesus of Nazareth to be a deranged and deluded lunatic. |
| |
[article]
Titre : |
The Unity of Luke—Acts in Recent Discussion |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Michael F. Bird, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2007 |
Article en page(s) : |
pp. 425-448. |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Tags : |
Luke—Acts • reception-history • unity |
Résumé : |
This article surveys the debate about the unity of Luke—Acts in recent scholarship. The study concentrates on monographs and articles written after Mikael C. Parsons and Richard I. Pervo's volume Rethinking the Unity of Luke and Acts, and identifies the recent contribution that reception-history studies have brought to the debate. This is followed with a brief analysis of the flashpoints in the debate, and a discussion of what is at stake for Lukan studies. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 425-448.
[article] The Unity of Luke—Acts in Recent Discussion [texte imprimé] / Michael F. Bird, Auteur . - 2007 . - pp. 425-448. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 425-448.
Tags : |
Luke—Acts • reception-history • unity |
Résumé : |
This article surveys the debate about the unity of Luke—Acts in recent scholarship. The study concentrates on monographs and articles written after Mikael C. Parsons and Richard I. Pervo's volume Rethinking the Unity of Luke and Acts, and identifies the recent contribution that reception-history studies have brought to the debate. This is followed with a brief analysis of the flashpoints in the debate, and a discussion of what is at stake for Lukan studies. |
| |
[article]
Titre : |
Literary Unity and Reception History : Reading Luke—Acts as Luke and Acts |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
C. Kavin Rowe, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2007 |
Article en page(s) : |
pp. 449-457. |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Résumé : |
In the effort both to clarify and advance the present scholarly discussion, this article continues a conversation about (a) the reception history of Luke and Acts and (b) the hermeneutical implications that derive from such history . After a brief recapitulation of the status quaestionis, the article presses for a clear distinction between literary unity and reception history. It then moves to examine the cogency of the suppositions about the history of the Lukan writings prior to their reception in the second century (and beyond) and suggests a scenario that renders intelligible the later developments. Finally, the article concludes with some reflections about the pertinence of reception history to New Testament studies.
Key Words: Reception history • literary unity •
|
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 449-457.
[article] Literary Unity and Reception History : Reading Luke—Acts as Luke and Acts [texte imprimé] / C. Kavin Rowe, Auteur . - 2007 . - pp. 449-457. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 449-457.
Résumé : |
In the effort both to clarify and advance the present scholarly discussion, this article continues a conversation about (a) the reception history of Luke and Acts and (b) the hermeneutical implications that derive from such history . After a brief recapitulation of the status quaestionis, the article presses for a clear distinction between literary unity and reception history. It then moves to examine the cogency of the suppositions about the history of the Lukan writings prior to their reception in the second century (and beyond) and suggests a scenario that renders intelligible the later developments. Finally, the article concludes with some reflections about the pertinence of reception history to New Testament studies.
Key Words: Reception history • literary unity •
|
| |
[article]
Titre : |
The Reception of Luke and Acts and the Unity of Luke—Acts |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
GREGORY Andrew, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2007 |
Article en page(s) : |
pp. 459-472. |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Résumé : |
This article argues that Irenaeus and the author of the Muratorian Fragment each read Luke and Acts as two elements of one literary whole, but that Irenaeus's understanding of what this literary unity entails appears to have been different from that of many modern scholarly readings of Luke—Acts. It also argues that there is reason to believe that Luke intended his two volumes to circulate together, and offers hermeneutical reflections on the fact that they have not always been read in this way. Two different approaches to the reception of Luke and Acts are identified and the merits of each are discussed. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 459-472.
[article] The Reception of Luke and Acts and the Unity of Luke—Acts [texte imprimé] / GREGORY Andrew, Auteur . - 2007 . - pp. 459-472. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 459-472.
Résumé : |
This article argues that Irenaeus and the author of the Muratorian Fragment each read Luke and Acts as two elements of one literary whole, but that Irenaeus's understanding of what this literary unity entails appears to have been different from that of many modern scholarly readings of Luke—Acts. It also argues that there is reason to believe that Luke intended his two volumes to circulate together, and offers hermeneutical reflections on the fact that they have not always been read in this way. Two different approaches to the reception of Luke and Acts are identified and the merits of each are discussed. |
| |
[article]
Titre : |
Critiquing the Excess of Empire : A Synkrisis of John of Patmos and Dio of Prusa |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Peter S. Perry, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2007 |
Article en page(s) : |
pp. 473-496. |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Résumé : |
Despite their many differences, John the Seer of Patmos and Dio the rhetorphilosopher of Prusa share a basic critique of the Roman Empire. Limiting the comparison to Rev. 18 and Dio's twelfth Olympic Oration (with an important reference to Dio's thirteenth Oration), this essay concludes that John and Dio critique the violence, exploitation and luxury of Rome, grounding their analysis in divine sovereignty over earthly rulers. This common critique suggests that John's message may have been sympathetically heard by a wider audience than simply a few Christian communities, and that Revelation should be reevaluated in this light. |
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 473-496.
[article] Critiquing the Excess of Empire : A Synkrisis of John of Patmos and Dio of Prusa [texte imprimé] / Peter S. Perry, Auteur . - 2007 . - pp. 473-496. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 473-496.
Résumé : |
Despite their many differences, John the Seer of Patmos and Dio the rhetorphilosopher of Prusa share a basic critique of the Roman Empire. Limiting the comparison to Rev. 18 and Dio's twelfth Olympic Oration (with an important reference to Dio's thirteenth Oration), this essay concludes that John and Dio critique the violence, exploitation and luxury of Rome, grounding their analysis in divine sovereignty over earthly rulers. This common critique suggests that John's message may have been sympathetically heard by a wider audience than simply a few Christian communities, and that Revelation should be reevaluated in this light. |
| |