Bibliothèque Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Auteur Solomon Benjamin
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Illegible claims, legal titles, and the worlding of Bangalore / Solomon Benjamin in Tiers monde, n°206 (avril - juin 2011)
[article]
Titre : Illegible claims, legal titles, and the worlding of Bangalore Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Solomon Benjamin, Auteur ; Bhuvaneswari Raman, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 37-54. Langues : Anglais (eng) Résumé : An ethnographic analysis of the politics of urban land titling in Bangalore, India, highlights an ongoing contest to claim territories, with popular practices confronting elites who are mobilizing new legal and institutional regimes, including “e-Governance”, to globalize that city. We mobilize Bourdieu and Wacquant’s “practice force field approach” to highlight two aspects of this politics viz., (i) the material aspects of land and its rooting in a deeply emotional realm and (ii) the dynamics, which are characterized by fluid politics shaped by flexible alliances, moves and countermoves between competing groups. The two case studies presented point to a consideration of a politics of opacity. A representation of this politics is necessarily discontinuous and rejects coherent logical narratives that de-politicize in order to justify neat “policy prescription”.
in Tiers monde > n°206 (avril - juin 2011) . - pp. 37-54.[article] Illegible claims, legal titles, and the worlding of Bangalore [texte imprimé] / Solomon Benjamin, Auteur ; Bhuvaneswari Raman, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 37-54.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Tiers monde > n°206 (avril - juin 2011) . - pp. 37-54.
Résumé : An ethnographic analysis of the politics of urban land titling in Bangalore, India, highlights an ongoing contest to claim territories, with popular practices confronting elites who are mobilizing new legal and institutional regimes, including “e-Governance”, to globalize that city. We mobilize Bourdieu and Wacquant’s “practice force field approach” to highlight two aspects of this politics viz., (i) the material aspects of land and its rooting in a deeply emotional realm and (ii) the dynamics, which are characterized by fluid politics shaped by flexible alliances, moves and countermoves between competing groups. The two case studies presented point to a consideration of a politics of opacity. A representation of this politics is necessarily discontinuous and rejects coherent logical narratives that de-politicize in order to justify neat “policy prescription”.