Bibliothèque Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Auteur Alexander Toepel
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Yonton Revisited / Alexander Toepel in Harvard Theological Review, 99/3 (July 2006)
[article]
Titre : Yonton Revisited : A Case Study in the Reception of Hellenistic Science within Early Judaism Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alexander Toepel, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Article en page(s) : pp. 235-245. Langues : Anglais (eng) Résumé : In the Syriac Book of the Cave of Treasures, which in a general way we may reckon among the rewritten Bible texts, in ch. 27.6–11, an apocryphal fourth son of Noah appears, Yon[tdotu ]on by name. This figure resides near the seashorein a far-easternland and possesses oracular and astrological wisdom. In 1980, Stephen Gero interpreted this figure against a Jewish background. Recently, however, Clemens Leonhard, following Witold Witakowski, has questioned this approach and denied any prehistory to Yon[tdotu ]on; he regards him as an “invention” of the Syriac author of the Cave of Treasures. In the present article I aim to investigate whether it is possible indeed to trace a Jewish origin of Yon[tdotu ]on's appearance in the Cave of Treasures. Taking Gero's interpretation as a starting point, I will first investigate the setting in which a figure like Yon[tdotu ]on could have evolved within a Jewish context. Secondly, I will attempt to actually identify Yon[tdotu ]on in earlier Jewish sources. In this I will follow a recent assertion of Su-Min Ri, that Yon[tdotu ]on originates in the Biblical person of Yoq[tdotu ]an (Gen 10:25). While Ri's assumption derives from the possibility of a misspelling, I will produce internal evidence which renders the identification of Yon[tdotu ]on and Yoq[tdotu ]an very probable, thus justifying the direction of thought taken by both Gero and Ri over against the allegations of Leonhard and Witakowski. Moreover, the following discussion will shed light on how Jews received influences from Hellenistic astronomy and astrology and how they read these concepts into, or set them in opposition to, the Bible.
in Harvard Theological Review > 99/3 (July 2006) . - pp. 235-245.[article] Yonton Revisited : A Case Study in the Reception of Hellenistic Science within Early Judaism [texte imprimé] / Alexander Toepel, Auteur . - 2007 . - pp. 235-245.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Harvard Theological Review > 99/3 (July 2006) . - pp. 235-245.
Résumé : In the Syriac Book of the Cave of Treasures, which in a general way we may reckon among the rewritten Bible texts, in ch. 27.6–11, an apocryphal fourth son of Noah appears, Yon[tdotu ]on by name. This figure resides near the seashorein a far-easternland and possesses oracular and astrological wisdom. In 1980, Stephen Gero interpreted this figure against a Jewish background. Recently, however, Clemens Leonhard, following Witold Witakowski, has questioned this approach and denied any prehistory to Yon[tdotu ]on; he regards him as an “invention” of the Syriac author of the Cave of Treasures. In the present article I aim to investigate whether it is possible indeed to trace a Jewish origin of Yon[tdotu ]on's appearance in the Cave of Treasures. Taking Gero's interpretation as a starting point, I will first investigate the setting in which a figure like Yon[tdotu ]on could have evolved within a Jewish context. Secondly, I will attempt to actually identify Yon[tdotu ]on in earlier Jewish sources. In this I will follow a recent assertion of Su-Min Ri, that Yon[tdotu ]on originates in the Biblical person of Yoq[tdotu ]an (Gen 10:25). While Ri's assumption derives from the possibility of a misspelling, I will produce internal evidence which renders the identification of Yon[tdotu ]on and Yoq[tdotu ]an very probable, thus justifying the direction of thought taken by both Gero and Ri over against the allegations of Leonhard and Witakowski. Moreover, the following discussion will shed light on how Jews received influences from Hellenistic astronomy and astrology and how they read these concepts into, or set them in opposition to, the Bible.