Bibliothèque Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Auteur K. L. Noll
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Canaan and Israel in Antiquity / K. L. Noll
Titre : Canaan and Israel in Antiquity : an Introduction Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : K. L. Noll, Auteur Editeur : Edinburgh : T & T Clark Année de publication : 2006 Collection : The Biblical Seminar num. 83 Importance : 331 pp. Format : 23,5 cm ISBN/ISSN/EAN : 978-1-84127-258-0 Langues : Anglais (eng) Tags : Canaan Israel Antiquité Index. décimale : 956.9 Canaan and Israel in Antiquity : an Introduction [texte imprimé] / K. L. Noll, Auteur . - Edinburgh : T & T Clark, 2006 . - 331 pp. ; 23,5 cm. - (The Biblical Seminar; 83) .
ISBN : 978-1-84127-258-0
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Tags : Canaan Israel Antiquité Index. décimale : 956.9 Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité TE 22.077 956.94 Livres FACULTE DE THEOLOGIE Livres Exclu du prêt Deuteronomistic History or Deuteronomic Debate? (A Thought Experiment) / K. L. Noll in Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 31/3 (March 2007)
[article]
Titre : Deuteronomistic History or Deuteronomic Debate? (A Thought Experiment) Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : K. L. Noll, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Article en page(s) : pp. 311-345. Langues : Anglais (eng) Résumé : This study intends to replace Martin Noth’s Deuteronomistic History hypothesis with an approach that makes better use of all available data. Three thesis statements establish a new paradigm for future research. First, to the extent that they have Deuteronomy in view, the Former Prophets represent not a deuteronomistic ideology, but a Deuteronomic debate. Second, the like-minded intellectuals who produced these scrolls did not intend to create authoritative scripture because their writings were not intended for mass consumption. Third, each book of the Former Prophets presents a distinctive pattern of response to Deuteronomy, usually negative but occasionally positive. In sum, what we have in the Former Prophets is a conversation with Deuteronomy. What we do not have, except for a few late glosses, is deuteronomism.
in Journal for the Study of the Old Testament > 31/3 (March 2007) . - pp. 311-345.[article] Deuteronomistic History or Deuteronomic Debate? (A Thought Experiment) [texte imprimé] / K. L. Noll, Auteur . - 2007 . - pp. 311-345.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal for the Study of the Old Testament > 31/3 (March 2007) . - pp. 311-345.
Résumé : This study intends to replace Martin Noth’s Deuteronomistic History hypothesis with an approach that makes better use of all available data. Three thesis statements establish a new paradigm for future research. First, to the extent that they have Deuteronomy in view, the Former Prophets represent not a deuteronomistic ideology, but a Deuteronomic debate. Second, the like-minded intellectuals who produced these scrolls did not intend to create authoritative scripture because their writings were not intended for mass consumption. Third, each book of the Former Prophets presents a distinctive pattern of response to Deuteronomy, usually negative but occasionally positive. In sum, what we have in the Former Prophets is a conversation with Deuteronomy. What we do not have, except for a few late glosses, is deuteronomism.