Bibliothèque Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Auteur Lewis Ayres
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (4)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Nicaea and its legacy / Lewis Ayres
Titre : Nicaea and its legacy : an approach to fourth-century Trinitarian theology Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Lewis Ayres, Auteur Editeur : Oxford : Oxford University Press Année de publication : cop. 2004 Importance : 1 vol. (475 p.) Présentation : couv. ill. en coul. Format : 25 cm ISBN/ISSN/EAN : 978-0-19-875506-7 Langues : Anglais (eng) Tags : Nicée Théologie Index. décimale : 050 Nicaea and its legacy : an approach to fourth-century Trinitarian theology [texte imprimé] / Lewis Ayres, Auteur . - Oxford : Oxford University Press, cop. 2004 . - 1 vol. (475 p.) : couv. ill. en coul. ; 25 cm.
ISBN : 978-0-19-875506-7
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Tags : Nicée Théologie Index. décimale : 050 Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité TR 11.003 050 Livres FACULTE DE THEOLOGIE Livres Exclu du prêt Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Introduction / Lewis Ayres in Harvard Theological Review, 100/2 (April 2007)
[article]
Titre : Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Introduction Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Lewis Ayres, Auteur Année de publication : 2008 Article en page(s) : pp. 141-144. Langues : Anglais (eng) Résumé : It is a privilege to have the opportunity for such extended reflection on my book Nicaea and Its Legacy. No doubt some authors feel that their manuscripts are truly finished before they are published: I am one of those who merely abandons a manuscript to the copy editors when other pressures demand an end to hostilities. It should be no surprise, then, that I have always envisaged Nicaea as a snapshot of a moving landscape, not just in the ever-growing body of scholarship on the fourth century, but also in my own thinking. Accordingly I will begin here as I was invited to do in our discussion at Harvard, by offering an account of what I think Nicaea accomplishes and of some areas in which the book needs further work.
in Harvard Theological Review > 100/2 (April 2007) . - pp. 141-144.[article] Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Introduction [texte imprimé] / Lewis Ayres, Auteur . - 2008 . - pp. 141-144.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Harvard Theological Review > 100/2 (April 2007) . - pp. 141-144.
Résumé : It is a privilege to have the opportunity for such extended reflection on my book Nicaea and Its Legacy. No doubt some authors feel that their manuscripts are truly finished before they are published: I am one of those who merely abandons a manuscript to the copy editors when other pressures demand an end to hostilities. It should be no surprise, then, that I have always envisaged Nicaea as a snapshot of a moving landscape, not just in the ever-growing body of scholarship on the fourth century, but also in my own thinking. Accordingly I will begin here as I was invited to do in our discussion at Harvard, by offering an account of what I think Nicaea accomplishes and of some areas in which the book needs further work.
A Response to the Critics of Nicaea and Its Legacy / Lewis Ayres in Harvard Theological Review, 100/2 (April 2007)
[article]
Titre : A Response to the Critics of Nicaea and Its Legacy Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Lewis Ayres, Auteur Année de publication : 2008 Article en page(s) : 159-171 Langues : Anglais (eng) Résumé : Let me turn in this “Response” to the concerns of those who have been unhappy with particular features of Nicaea and Its Legacy. Although the bulk of my discussion will be taken up with the responses of Khaled Anatolios and John Behr, I want also to range a little more widely. For the most part, criticisms of my book Nicaea have stemmed as much from opposition to my overall attitude towards the task of historical theology as from opposition to my interpretation of particular episodes of the fourth century. A range of related questions focuses on the relationship between the good practice of theology and the implications of the forms of modern historical consciousness that I have clearly found persuasive. The three critics that I engage here all seem to me to be pushing in directions that (consciously or unconsciously) inappropriately restrict the scope and character of theological—and particularly of historical theological—investigation. I must confess at the beginning of this discussion that I assumed the majority of negative responses to my project as a whole (as opposed to negative responses to particular sections of the argument) would come from what might be termed the theological “left”: those who are convinced by some of the fundamental lines of post-Enlightenment and recent liberal critique of classical Christian tradition. It has, however, been fascinating to see other critics emerge from what might perhaps be termed the theological “right”: those sympathetic to modern attempts to retrieve the centrality of classical Christian texts, theologians, and exegetical methods. Both forms of critique demand a response.
in Harvard Theological Review > 100/2 (April 2007) . - 159-171[article] A Response to the Critics of Nicaea and Its Legacy [texte imprimé] / Lewis Ayres, Auteur . - 2008 . - 159-171.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Harvard Theological Review > 100/2 (April 2007) . - 159-171
Résumé : Let me turn in this “Response” to the concerns of those who have been unhappy with particular features of Nicaea and Its Legacy. Although the bulk of my discussion will be taken up with the responses of Khaled Anatolios and John Behr, I want also to range a little more widely. For the most part, criticisms of my book Nicaea have stemmed as much from opposition to my overall attitude towards the task of historical theology as from opposition to my interpretation of particular episodes of the fourth century. A range of related questions focuses on the relationship between the good practice of theology and the implications of the forms of modern historical consciousness that I have clearly found persuasive. The three critics that I engage here all seem to me to be pushing in directions that (consciously or unconsciously) inappropriately restrict the scope and character of theological—and particularly of historical theological—investigation. I must confess at the beginning of this discussion that I assumed the majority of negative responses to my project as a whole (as opposed to negative responses to particular sections of the argument) would come from what might be termed the theological “left”: those who are convinced by some of the fundamental lines of post-Enlightenment and recent liberal critique of classical Christian tradition. It has, however, been fascinating to see other critics emerge from what might perhaps be termed the theological “right”: those sympathetic to modern attempts to retrieve the centrality of classical Christian texts, theologians, and exegetical methods. Both forms of critique demand a response.
The Cambridge history of early christian literature
Titre : The Cambridge history of early christian literature Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Frances Margaret Young (1939-....), Éditeur scientifique ; Lewis Ayres, Éditeur scientifique ; Andrew Louth (1944-....), Éditeur scientifique Editeur : Cambridge : Cambridge university press Année de publication : cop. 2004 Importance : XXV-537 p. Présentation : carte Format : 24 cm ISBN/ISSN/EAN : 978-0-521-46083-5 Note générale : Bibliogr. p. 495-530. Index Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : 270 The Cambridge history of early christian literature [texte imprimé] / Frances Margaret Young (1939-....), Éditeur scientifique ; Lewis Ayres, Éditeur scientifique ; Andrew Louth (1944-....), Éditeur scientifique . - Cambridge : Cambridge university press, cop. 2004 . - XXV-537 p. : carte ; 24 cm.
ISBN : 978-0-521-46083-5
Bibliogr. p. 495-530. Index
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Index. décimale : 270 Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires(1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité TT 10.107 270 Livres FACULTE DE THEOLOGIE Livres Exclu du prêt